International Structures and Intellectual Property Alignment
A holding company can simplify ownership, dividends, and exits while leveraging tax treaties to reduce withholding on cross-border payments. Substance requirements and anti-abuse rules are stricter than ever, so governance, staffing, and local decision-making must be real. Model both tax and operational frictions before forming entities abroad.
International Structures and Intellectual Property Alignment
Placing intellectual property where genuine development, enhancement, maintenance, protection, and exploitation occur aligns tax outcomes with reality. R&D incentives can offset costs when substance is documented. Resist chasing low nominal rates without people, processes, and records to match, because misalignment invites controversy and expensive corrections.
International Structures and Intellectual Property Alignment
Intercompany pricing on services, IP, and tangible goods should reflect how value is created. Comparable data, consistent policies, and clear contracts reduce disputes and surprises. Treat documentation as an ongoing operating discipline rather than a year-end scramble, and encourage cross-functional accountability for compliant, predictable results.